Calculation method and use
Estimates peak runoff for small to medium drainage areas using the Rational Method with runoff coefficient, rainfall intensity and catchment area.

Estimate stormwater runoff with the Rational Method using rainfall intensity, drainage area and runoff coefficient for quick preliminary sizing.
Calculates peak runoff using the Rational Method.
Estimates peak runoff for small to medium drainage areas using the Rational Method with runoff coefficient, rainfall intensity and catchment area.
A common peak-flow estimate based on runoff coefficient, rainfall intensity and drainage area.
It is a dimensionless representation of how much rainfall becomes direct surface runoff.
Use accepted local IDF data or rainfall statistics from the relevant authority.
The Rational Method is a practical way to estimate peak runoff from relatively small drainage catchments. CivilCalc combines drainage area, rainfall intensity and runoff coefficient, and the mixed-catchment mode helps calculate a representative weighted C for multiple surface types. The quality of the result depends heavily on selecting rainfall intensity for the appropriate return period and time of concentration.
Content and method reviewed: 19 September 2026
The relationship is Q = C × i × A with the appropriate unit factor. C is the dimensionless runoff coefficient, i is rainfall intensity and A is drainage area. The method estimates the peak condition when runoff from the contributing catchment reaches the design point.
C represents the fraction of rainfall that becomes rapid surface runoff. These ranges are preliminary references; local criteria and project conditions take precedence.
| Surface | Typical C range | Design note |
|---|---|---|
| Roof | 0.85–0.95 | Impervious, rapidly drained surface. |
| Asphalt / dense pavement | 0.80–0.95 | Slope and surface condition can matter. |
| Concrete | 0.85–0.95 | Usually produces high direct runoff. |
| Pavers / partly permeable pavement | 0.50–0.80 | Jointing, base and infiltration affect response. |
| Lawn / landscaped ground | 0.15–0.40 | Highly sensitive to soil, slope and saturation. |
| Dense mixed development | 0.60–0.90 | Use an area-weighted coefficient where possible. |
A single C value is not universal. Soil, slope, antecedent wetness, pavement and the governing design standard should be considered.
For several surface types use Cw = Σ(CᵢAᵢ) / ΣAᵢ. If 30% of a catchment is roof (0.95), 40% asphalt (0.85) and 30% landscaped ground (0.25), weighted C is approximately 0.70.
The catchment area and C=0.70 are held constant; only rainfall intensity changes.
| Rainfall intensity | Peak runoff | Relative effect |
|---|---|---|
| Reference | ||
| +50% | ||
| +100% | ||
| +150% |
Time of concentration represents the travel time from the hydraulically most remote contributing point to the design outlet. The duration used to select rainfall intensity from an IDF relationship should be consistent with this travel time. An unrealistically short duration can overstate intensity; an overly long duration can understate the peak.
The method estimates a peak rate, not the full runoff hydrograph. Large catchments, detention storage, routing effects, complex drainage networks or projects where runoff timing is important may require hydrograph-based methods and more detailed hydraulic/hydrologic modelling.
No. The Rational Method uses an intensity selected for a specific duration and return period, commonly from local IDF data. A daily rainfall total is not the same input.
Where surface areas are known, calculate an area-weighted coefficient from the individual surface C values rather than selecting one arbitrary value.
No. It is the estimated peak inflow from the catchment. The pipe or channel must separately be checked for capacity, velocity, depth and downstream conditions.
The selected design rainfall intensity will commonly increase, which increases calculated peak runoff. The appropriate return period depends on project type and the governing authority criteria.