Calculation method and use
Uses the Manning equation to estimate discharge in open channels or gravity conduits from area, hydraulic radius, slope and roughness.

Estimate flow capacity and velocity using pipe/channel geometry, slope and Manning roughness for open-channel or pipe-flow checks.
Uses Manning's equation to calculate full-flow capacity or actual partial-flow conditions for a given inflow.
Uses the Manning equation to estimate discharge in open channels or gravity conduits from area, hydraulic radius, slope and roughness.
It is widely used for estimating uniform gravity flow in open channels and suitable conduit conditions.
With other inputs unchanged, computed discharge decreases because resistance is higher.
The flow area divided by wetted perimeter: R=A/P.
The Manning equation is used to estimate discharge and mean velocity in open channels and gravity conduits flowing with a free surface. CivilCalc derives circular-pipe geometry from diameter and flow condition, calculates flow area, wetted perimeter and hydraulic radius, then applies Manning’s relationship. Use it to compare diameter, slope and roughness scenarios during preliminary sizing and hydraulic checks.
Content and method reviewed: 18 September 2026
In SI units the relationship is Q = (1/n) × A × R^(2/3) × S^(1/2). Q is discharge, n is Manning roughness, A is flow area, R=A/P is hydraulic radius and S is energy slope. For approximately uniform gravity flow, energy slope is commonly taken as the conduit or channel slope.
For a full circular section, A=πD²/4, wetted perimeter P=πD and hydraulic radius R=D/4. These relationships explain why capacity rises rapidly as diameter increases. A gravity sewer, however, is not necessarily designed to run full at design flow; allowable depth ratio and operating criteria should be checked separately.
Roughness is not determined by material name alone. Surface condition, joints, aging, sediment, biological growth and construction quality can change resistance. A typical value is useful for screening, but final design should use values consistent with the project specification, manufacturer information and expected operating condition. Testing more than one n value also shows how sensitive capacity is to roughness assumptions.
Discharge varies with the square root of slope, so doubling slope does not double capacity. On very flat systems, a small elevation error can materially change the calculated grade. Check invert elevations, horizontal run and whether the input is expressed as percent or decimal before interpreting the result.
Gravity sewers commonly operate partially full. As depth changes, flow area, wetted perimeter and hydraulic radius change together, so partial-flow capacity and velocity are not fixed percentages of the full-flow values. Manning’s equation is intended for free-surface flow; use an appropriate pressurized-flow method such as Darcy–Weisbach when the conduit is flowing full under pressure.
Use these ranges for preliminary comparison only. Surface condition, joints, aging, sediment and project specifications can justify a different design value.
| Surface / material | Typical n range | Practical note |
|---|---|---|
| Smooth PVC | 0.009–0.011 | Low resistance for clean, smooth internal surfaces. |
| HDPE | 0.009–0.012 | Jointing and deformation conditions should be considered. |
| Concrete / reinforced concrete pipe | 0.012–0.015 | Joints, aging and deposits can increase effective roughness. |
| Corrugated pipe | 0.012–0.024+ | Internal wall geometry and manufacturer data are important. |
| Finished concrete channel | 0.012–0.016 | Finish quality and maintenance condition affect resistance. |
| Earth channel | 0.018–0.035+ | Vegetation and irregularity can produce a wide range. |
These are general engineering reference ranges, not project-specific design values. Use governing specifications or manufacturer data when available.
The comparison keeps internal diameter at 24 in and n=0.013 while changing only slope.
| Slope | S | Full-flow discharge | Mean velocity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25% | 0.0025 | 10.84 cfs | 3.56 ft/s |
| 0.50% | 0.0050 | 15.33 cfs | 5.04 ft/s |
| 1.00% | 0.0100 | 21.68 cfs | 7.12 ft/s |
| 2.00% | 0.0200 | 30.67 cfs | 10.08 ft/s |
Example full-flow comparison at n=0.013 and 0.50% slope:
| Internal diameter | Full-flow discharge | Mean velocity |
|---|---|---|
| 12 in | 2.41 cfs | 3.17 ft/s |
| 16 in | 5.20 cfs | 3.84 ft/s |
| 20 in | 9.43 cfs | 4.46 ft/s |
| 24 in | 15.33 cfs | 5.04 ft/s |
| 32 in | 33.02 cfs | 6.10 ft/s |
| 40 in | 59.87 cfs | 7.08 ft/s |
This table illustrates hydraulic sensitivity only. Final diameter selection should also consider depth ratio, velocity criteria, minimum size, maintenance access and authority requirements.
This calculator is intended for free-surface gravity flow. For a pipe flowing full under pressure, use a pressurized-flow method such as Darcy–Weisbach for friction and energy-loss calculations.
With the other variables unchanged, discharge is proportional to the square root of slope. Increasing slope by a factor of four therefore increases theoretical capacity by about a factor of two.
Discharge is inversely proportional to n. A higher roughness coefficient produces a lower calculated capacity for the same geometry and slope.
Hydraulic calculations depend on the actual flow area. If wall thickness makes the internal diameter different from the nominal size, use the manufacturer’s internal-diameter data.